Foolish liberal feminists who wrongly and irrationally complain about a war on women ought to be prepared to meet their betters. One group of conservatives is going to make it awful difficult for them to be taken as anything other than the joke that they are. What makes this group of conservatives so special and unique? They are all women. Yes, that’s right. Women! Women standing up for conservative principles amidst the fog of war that is in actuality no war at all, but in the lurid, corrupt and feckle-encrusted minds of liberal feminists like Sandra Fluke, the National Organization of Women, Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Shultz and the entire Democrat Party, all of whom are the real traitors to, and of, women. Women will be represented in congress, and women will be a driving force in shaping policy. But it will be conservative women, not mushy, emotional, nonsensical, wishy-washy feminists who demand the killing of unborn children be legally sanctioned by government and paid for by taxpayers.
Does that sound erratic and scatter-brained to you? These conservative women are proof that the war on women is, and has been, a canard all along. Nobody is being fooled by this charade but these feminists themselves who still think they have made any case at all against conservatism and so-called misogynists who oppose taxpayer-funded contraception and forcing religious institutions to pay for birth control, including that birth control used specifically in the act of sexual irresponsibility.
The National Organization of Women, which is the equivalent of an empty, discarded shell not even a crustacean would inhabit tried, and failed, to shut down Rush Limbaugh, has been telling American women for decades that men, and conservative men in particular, are anti-woman. Yet, for all their pooh-poohing, there are more women (Rush Babes, as they are known) who support Limbaugh than support NOW. If American women really felt there was a war on women, wouldn’t that be reversed?
The reality is, as it has always been, that women are far more pro-life and pro-family than liberal feminists give them credit for being. But that doesn’t translate into the “barefoot and pregnant” definition liberal feminists have ascribed to being pro-life and pro-family. It’s interesting to note that while conservative men are not at all fearful of a conservative women with an intelligent, independent mind of her own, liberal feminists are. A woman’s mind that cannot be controlled, influenced and shaped by liberal feminist dogma is a mind that any liberal feminist fears.
Every other group in America is “coming out”. Now it is time for conservative women to come out. There are many millions of them, whose numbers are being underrepresented in the MSM. Conservative men, who are secure in both their politics and their manhood, are looking for more conservative women to come out of the shadows and help them win back America from the grips of liberalism and to beat back those feminists who insist to be pro-life is to be a misogynist.
The values and morals held by conservative women are worth taking seriously. The values and morals held by liberal women are worth taking out with the trash, seriously, including their biography of “Julia“. But when you do take them out to the trash, don’t mix them in with the recycling. Or – do you see anything in liberal feminism worth reusing?
- A better life for ‘Julia’ (theblaze.com)
- Is THIS Julia? Do YOU Know Julia? (nebraskaenergyobserver.wordpress.com)
- Liberal Feminists Complaining About The “War On Women” Ought To Keep Their Mouths Shut (neosecularist.com)
- Respect for Women Means Being Abstinent And Pro-Life (neosecularist.com)
- The “War On Women” Is All About Abortion (The Daily Kos Proves It) (neosecularist.com)