Of Michelle Goldberg Part 11: Her Support of “Women’s Automony” Means Death To Millions Of Unborn Girls
They call it “gendercide”. The deliberate killing of an unborn child based on its gender. In the vast majority of cases that gender is female. The House of Representatives tried, but failed, to pass a law that would have outlawed this type of abortion. However, Democrats, virtually all of whom are pro-abortion on demand, blocked passage of the law. Naturally, all pro-abortion liberal feminists are giddy with sadistic delight over this, including Michelle Goldberg who writes:
Sex-selective abortion is odious. Banning it means allowing the government to decide what constitutes a legitimate reason for a woman to terminate a pregnancy.”
In other words, so far as “woman’s autonomy” goes, and just how far Michelle Goldberg and all her liberal, pro-abortion feminist ilk are willing to go to preserve that “autonomy, Goldberg, like all pro-abortion liberal feminists, believes the killing of an unborn girl “constitutes a legitimate reason for a woman to terminate her pregnancy”. Goldberg believes abortion on demand, for any reason a woman might dream up, during any time she is pregnant, including up until the very due date, the very moment the baby is about to pop its head out, (crowning) is acceptable enough time to still kill the child before it is legally and technically born.
Goldberg uses an excuse to deflect attention away from this heinous and despicable type of abortion by reminding us that most “gendercide” abortions occur in Asia, in China and India, and are not that common in America.
Reporting on sex-selective abortion in India, where feminists campaign against kanya bhronn hatya—literally, “the killing of young girls”—and patriarchs angrily assert their right to plan their families, I sometimes felt like I’d stepped through a looking glass. Clearly, the American anti-abortion movement would be happy to frame the debate in similar terms.”
We only frame the debate on abortion in one term – the killing of innocent life. While Goldberg works to protect “woman’s autonomy” over her body by fighting for greater legal protections for woman and girls of all ages to have guaranteed rights to abortion whenever they want, we who are pro-life fight for greater legal protections for the unborn from those women and girls who would seek to end their pregnancies based upon the viscous lies of Michelle Goldberg, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW, Cecile Richards, Terri O’Neill and Nancy Keenan, and all liberal pro-abortion feminists. Their lies have caused the deaths of scores of millions of unborn children over the decades, and over 100 millions unborn girls.
These same undeniably callous and passionately misguided women who dare to claim there is a war on women being waged by the GOP and conservatives are the real terrorists waging a war on women by intentionally deceiving and misleading women and girls into believing that abortion is not the killing of an unborn child but just the removal of a blob of tissue, a “zygote”, a few cells, etc. They would look us in the eyes and demand we yield to their insanity. We dare to look back into their eyes and stand tall, stand proud, stand resolute in our courage and conviction that abortion takes the life of an unborn child and we will not back down.
It’s not surprising that anti-abortion activists see sex-selective abortion as their trump card. The issue puts feminists in a particularly difficult spot, turning reproductive choice into a tool of misogyny.”
Difficult spot? Where is there a liberal pro-abortion feminist that has come out in support of banning “gendercide”? If it was a “difficult spot”, if there was any amount of “difficulty” that put feminists in a “spot” that “difficulty” would have derived straight from their own conscience and every single feminist knows it. In other words, the only way Michelle Goldberg or any liberal pro-abortion feminist could be put in a “difficult spot” is if their own conscience turned against their liberal feminist mindset.
Misogyny? Michelle Goldberg supports the killing of unborn girls. the GOP and conservatives support protecting unborn girls from being killed in the womb because they are girls in the womb. Who is the real misogynist?
Of course, the real “difficult spot” Michelle Goldberg and her ilk have been put in is that they are forced by their own narrow-mindedness to support the killing of unborn girls because if just that one type of abortion is wrong, and they accept that it is wrong, such a move opens up the very real possibility of ending other types of specific abortion like abortion based on race and sexual orientation.
That Michelle Goldberg supports the killing of unborn girls in the womb without reserve, also means she supports the killing of blacks in the womb because they are black, and the killing of gays in the womb because they will be born gay. And there in lies the rub. She must support killing blacks and gays in the womb, just as vehemently as she must support the killing of girls in the womb. Any hesitation, no matter how slight, is indication that abortion, for even one specific reason, may be wrong and immoral when done for other specific reasons.
Can there be any doubt that Michelle Goldberg cringes over the thought of one girl being killed in the womb because of its gender? Either she cringes, perhaps even weeps, or she has no heart, no conscience, at all. And yet, Michelle Goldberg must go along with “gendercide”, supporting it and being unapologetic in her pursuit of abortion on demand, deflecting the issue as anti-woman, a war on women and misogynist.
For now, with the failure to pass “gendercide” in the House, a “woman’s autonomy” remains intact. However, the war on unborn girls continues to be waged, taking a heavy toll and untold casualties all in the name of “pro-choice”. Does the right to choose to kill an unborn girl in the womb. because it is a girl, in any way really preserve a “woman’s autonomy”?
The lesson is clear. Anyone who is genuinely concerned about sex-selective abortion should be working to fight sexism, its underlying cause. Laws that seek to limit women’s autonomy and confine them to traditional roles have it precisely backward. Unless, of course, limiting women’s autonomy and confining them to traditional roles has been the goal all along.”
Fighting sexism by supporting abortion, and supporting the killing of unborn girls in the womb, is counterproductive. Sexism, in itself, is why unborn girls are being killed in the womb in the first place. For Goldberg to insinuate, to insist, that sexism will end when women have the right, and so long as they maintain that right, to kill their unborn girls in the womb without government interference would be laughable but for its tragic consequences. Goldberg wants us to believe that sexism will end when women have the right to abortion, and the right to kill their unborn child for any reason at any time during her pregnancy – on demand, in privacy, without anyone trying to prevent her from going through with it. Goldberg is deluding herself if she thinks we are that gullible.
We who are pro-life will continue to find ways to ban abortion, at the same time we work to educate woman and girls about the realities of abortion. Michelle Goldberg expounds the lies of Planned Parenthood and Cecile Richards, NOW and Terry O’Neill and NARAL and Nancy Keenan. These women support the killing of girls in the womb, blacks in the womb, gays in the womb any unborn child in the womb. Either that is moral or that is immoral. Either that is evil or that is benevolent. Either that is right or that is wrong. Either we – who are pro-life – have the courage to continue fighting to save the lives of unborn children or we stand aside and allow the slaughter to go on without stop. We know where Michelle Goldberg is on this. Where are we on this?
- Of Michelle Goldberg Part 9: To Her, A “Wrongful Birth” Means One Less Abortion (neosecularist.com)
- House votes on sex-selective abortion bill; Obama and Left think gendercide is hunky-dory (twitchy.com)
- Planned Parenthood/Cecile Richards; NOW/Terry O’Neill And NARAL/Nancy Keenan Have Committed Devestating War Crimes Against Humanity (neosecularist.com)
- Why liberals really fear the “gendercide” debate (humanevents.com)
- LifeNews Pro-Life News Report 5/31/12 (deaconjohnspace.wordpress.com)
- Planned Parenthood Encourages Woman To Abort Baby Because It’s Female… (redalexandriava.com)
- Defending the Civil Rights of Baby Girls: The Battle Heats Up! (erasetheneed.wordpress.com)
- The Future Civil Rights of Baby Girls (trinityspeaks.wordpress.com)
- Live Action Undercover Bombshell: Planned Parenthood Aids Gender-selective Abortion (pumabydesign001.com)
- Live Action sting: Planned Parenthood counsels late-term sex-selection abortion (winteryknight.wordpress.com)
- Second video shows Planned Parenthood clinic advising on how to get a sex-selective abortion; Update: WH opposes sex-selective abortion ban bill (Hotair.com)
- Isn’t It Time to Outlaw Gendercide? (heritage.org)
- HLI President Urges Passage of PRENDA in U.S. House (thesalvationtimes.wordpress.com)
- House Democrats Vote to Support Gender-Based Abortions (thegatewaypundit.com)
- Sex-Selective Abortion Ban Fails In House (lezgetreal.com)
- Here it is: Part II Gendercide in NY (barbarasblogging.wordpress.com)
- IRD: Why Are So Many Churches Silent about Gender Selective Abortion? (thesalvationtimes.wordpress.com)