Mitt Romney is a conservative. In light of the fact that Barack Obama is a liberal, just how conservative Romney is pales in comparison to just how liberal Obama is. Conservatives control the House, they may control the Senate after 2012 as well, or at least gain more seats. A Romney win, with a conservative House and a conservative Senate, or having gained more seats in the Senate, is far more important to conservatives and conservatism, and to America, than quibbling over just how conservative Romney really is. Is Romney a liberal? If not, then he must be a conservative. He is not a moderate. Why are we wasting time debating Romney’s conservatism when we ought to be uniting behind him because he is the better choice over Obama?
The same people “frightened” over Romney being a Mormon are the same people who are frightened by Obama and the policies he has enacted over the course of his Presidency. Which is more frightening? Romney being a Mormon? Or – Obama’s policies?
The same people who challenge Romney’s conservatism are the same people who challenge Obama’s legitimacy as President and as an American citizen, and his policies. Which is the better and more pertinent challenge? Romney’s conservatism? Or – Obama’s policies?
The same people who insist Romney is not conservative enough, are the same people who insist Obama is too liberal. Which is the better alternative? Romney, who may not be conservative enough for some conservatives? Or – Obama, who is too liberal for all conservatives?
The same people who fear Romney will not push for conservative policies with as great a fervor as they believed Rick Santorum, or other Republicans, might have, are the same people who fear Obama would push for more liberal policies in his second term. Which is the better alternative? Romney pushing for conservative policies, even if they are not deemed “conservative enough” for some conservatives? Or – Obama, who would push for more liberal policies deemed too liberal for all conservatives?
The same people who worry Romney, as President, will let them down by not supporting, more vigorously, more courageously, conservative issues, policies and legislation, are the same people who are now worried because of the issues, policies and legislation Obama has supported. Which is less worrisome? Romney supporting some conservative issues, policies and legislation, and supporting some more vigorously and courageously than others? Or – Obama, who supports zero conservative issues, policies and legislation, nor would he in his second term, and who supports liberal issues, policies and legislation very aggressively, very vigorously?
The same people who oppose Romney as the Republican nominee for President, and as President, because he is a Mormon, are the same people who oppose Obama being President because they either believe he is a Muslim or an atheistic/counterfeit Christian President. Which is less unsettling? Romney, who is a Mormon, and someone who upholds the same values as conservative Christians, Catholics and Jews? Or – Obama, who, regardless of whether or not he is an atheist, a Muslim or a Christian, upholds values diametrically opposed to conservative Christians, Catholics and Jews?
There is no logical reason for conservatives to oppose Romney on the basis that he is not “conservative enough”. He is more conservative than Obama, and that should be the more, and the most, important criteria than anything else, and Romney as President ought to make all conservatives more comfortable than Obama as President.
Why is it worth it to any conservative to quibble, to squabble, to debate just how conservative Romney is, compared to Obama?
Why is it worth it to any conservative to see Obama reelected to a second term because Romney may not be conservative enough for some conservatives?
Why is it worth it to any conservative to see America taken down an even darker and dangerous path, all conservatives agree Obama would in his second term, than it is in seeing Romney beating Obama in the 2012 election and having that much more of a chance to change that path to a better and more brighter one, simply because Romney may not be “conservative enough” for some conservatives?
Is Romney a RINO – Republican in name only? Not only is there is no evidence to this, Romney has clearly stated his positions on the issues throughout the debates. Romney is clearly a Republican, and a conservative Republican, in his politics. Is Obama a DINO – Democrat in name only? Not only is there no evidence to this, Obama has clearly demonstrated that he is a Democrat, and a liberal Democrat, and supports, with a passion, Democrat positions and issues that every other liberal supports. Which makes conservatives less anxious? Romney, even if he is a RINO? Or – Obama, who has 3 1/2 years worth of a track record supporting a very liberal agenda, and who will continue that agenda into a second term?
Which is the better use of time and energy for conservatives? That time and energy invested quibbling over whether or not Romney is “conservative enough” to be President of America? Or – that time and energy invested in standing behind, and with, Romney, for President of America over Barack Obama?
- Who Would Vote For A Mormon For President? (neosecularist.com)
- Obama vs. Romney: Close, nasty and unpredictable (africanleader.net)
- House conservatives appear ready, if not excited, to support Romney (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com)
- End of Progressive Politics Around the world – Obama Like Val Schier is going to be beaten by a Conservative – Obama 43% vs Romney 48% – Val Schier 25% vs Bob Manning 45 % (rajcairnsreport.wordpress.com)
- The Meme War We Must Win (johnmalcolm.me)
- Who is Mitt Romney? (rimboval.wordpress.com)
- So glad it’s Mitt and not Santorum (mitsilancer.wordpress.com)
- Romney: Oh, that president … He’s always looking for a scapegoat (Hotair.com)