The Neosecularist

I Said That? Yeah, I Said That!

Archive for the category “Hollywood liberals”

“CCOKCS” Are “CCUNTTS”: Kirk Cameron, Homosexuality And Hollywood Has-beens

A lot of backlash has sprouted up over Kirk Cameron’s comments about homosexuality.  First, here is what Kirk said that has ignited a firestorm of hate and anti-Christian bigotry.  (And remember, from the liberal point of view, bigotry is perfectly acceptable so long as that bigotry is directed at Christianity,Catholicism, Judaism – and now Mormonism.

In response to Cameron’s comments, former, and has-been, child celebrities from sitcoms dating back to the 1980′s have wormed their way back into the public conscience with a new “Funny or Die” video, calling themselves “CCOKCS”, which is an acronym for Child Celebrities Opposing Kirk Cameron. Here is their video: (Warning: vulgar, but mostly childish, language)

This, by the way, is how all but forgotten, and better to have been left behind in our dusty memories of fonder times, now all grown up and still out of control, Hollywood child “stars” behave themselves into their adulthood.  They are, after-all, a product of Hollywood, and the influences of that particular culture.  Kirk Cameron was as well, but he escaped from it.  He grew out of it, grew away from it and – grew up.

Cameron’s remarks about homosexuality should not bother anyone.  In fact, what Cameron says about the gay and lesbian lifestyle is incredibly tame, compared to what Islam says about it.  What about what Louis Farrakhan and The Nation of Islam say about it?

The words of these washed-up, dried-up, shriveled-up, insignificant , tiny “CCOKCS ” are sterile, as are the rants of others who have jumped on the “Let’s mock Kirk Cameron” band-wagon.  These same people who deride and ridicule Cameron would absolutely never, at least openly, use or spread the same venomous words they employ against Cameron on Muslims or black converts to the Nation of Islam.  So, why do they feel comfortable mocking Cameron?

Because if these same Hollywood celebrities were to condemn Islam and the Nation of Islam for how they perceive homosexuality (which is far more vitriolic and forceful, and with a greater hatred, than Cameron) Muslims, as they have a tendency to do would overreact in violent ways, calling for death, for fatwas, for heads to literally roll.  Liberal Hollywood jet-setters know this, and they fear the retribution that would entail.  They also know Cameron would not only not threaten them, he would probably pray for them – which one must accept is worse a fate to them than being beheaded.

Hollywood liberals, safe inside their beltway, and among their kind, will continue to bash, and “Twitter” away against, Kirk Cameron and any Christian or religious person or group (except for Muslims) who speak out against homosexuality.  And once in a while, former television “stars”, who can find no other way to make public appearance respectively will instead make public spectacles of themselves.

We do, naturally, have a curiosity as to what has happened to the children who starred in the sitcoms we watched decades ago.  Just as curiosity killed the cat, so too have these “CCOKCS” killed any curiosity we might have had about what happened to them.  Which is why these “CCOKCS” are really nothing more than dry, saggy, loose, wrinkled, disgusting to look at “CCUNTTS”.

Childish Celebrities, Untalented Nitwits, Talking Trashy

What comes out of these “CCUNTTS”  just made tapioca pudding and cottage cheese so much more appetizing!

About these ads

Calling The Pope A Nazi Is Heroic? Calling Obama A Failed President Is Racist?

When Susan Sarandon called Pope Benedict XVI a Nazi what exactly was she hoping to gain by the remark?  Does she really believe the Pope is a Nazi or was she just having a bad a day and needed to vent?  Does Susan even know what a Nazi is?  That is a fair question to ask of a liberal, any liberal, such as Susan who, on the one hand supports abortion on demand, but on the other hand, opposes the death penalty as much as the Pope she called a Nazi.  (She starred in “Dead Man Walking”, in 1995, a movie with anti-death penalty themes.)  And liberals have a strong tendency to simply throw around words to see where they stick.  The problem here, of course, is that there is nowhere for “Nazi” to stick when referring to Pope Benedict XVI.

Perhaps she was referring to the Pope’s earlier, albeit brief, ties to Nazism when, in his youth, and when he was known by his German name Joseph Ratzinger, he was forced to join Hitler’s Youth, as were all young Germans at the time.  But the war ended, Nazism failed, and Joseph, who never embraced Nazism to begin with, grew up to be a strong Catholic and eventually Pope, after the death of Pope John Paul II.

One is hard pressed to find a liberal who has the courage to openly show respect for such a man as Pope Benedict XVI.  Why did Susan Sarandon really call the Pope a Nazi?  More than likely it is because she is a deeply convicted liberal and he is a deeply religious conservative who opposes abortion, homosexuality and gay marriage, socialism and the socialist agenda which seeks to uproot and overthrow religion and religious institutions.  When do you ever see, or hear of, a conservative calling a liberal a Nazi?  (Maybe Rush Limbaugh when he refers to feminists as femi-Nazis.  And it might do well to examine the term more in-depth and find out how much truth there is to it.)

Liberals, hypocrites as they are, have no problem with throwing around such words as ‘Nazi” when it comes to conservatives, and in particular religious conservatives; and left wing extremist pro abortion groups like NOW, have no problem calling pro-life activists terrorists.  But when conservatives use words like “I hope Obama fails”, Obama is a failure, Obama, the first black U.S. President, is the worst President in U.S. history – we are labeled racists, despite the fact that when we use words, we can usually back them up; and despite the fact that liberals called George W. Bush, his father and former President George H. W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan much, much worse during their Presidencies.

And yet, Obama has failed to produce the millions of jobs he promised he would.  Obama has failed to turn our economy around as he promised he would.  Obama has failed to cut taxes on the middle class as he promised he would.  And Obama has failed to end partisanship in politics and in America with regards to race as he promised he would.  Race relations in America are worse now than they were before Obama took office – and that is the direct fault of black liberals in congress and all over America.  The racism we are seeing now in America is coming most directly from liberal blacks, not conservative whites.

Barack Obama is a failed President.  (And this is mostly a good thing for America and all Americans.)

Why?

Because the way in which Obama wanted jobs to be created in America would have cost American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars and would only have created government, public sector jobs and expanded government itself.  In other words, the only jobs Obama is concerned with creating are those that grow the size and scope of government, but which do not expand the size and scope of the economy.  The more we grow government, the more government jobs we create, the more it costs all taxpayers.  However, creating jobs in the private sector not only costs taxpayers nothing, it not only aides the economy and economic growth, it also generates new tax revenue.  To create a government, public sector job, you must pay someone with the money collected through taxes.  To create a private sector job, a business owner must pay someone out of their own pocket.

Certainly we, as conservatives, hope Obama fails to achieve his ultimate goal of bigger government, higher taxes and less freedom and liberty for all Americans.  Certainly we, as conservatives, know how much better off America, Americanism and all freedom loving Americans will be should Obama fail to achieve these goals.  Certainly we, as conservatives, know that by hoping Obama fails in his goals, we are not applying racism behind our motives.  If Obama were white, and he, as a white President, had the same agenda, we would hope for his failure just as aggressively.

So no, Pope Benedict XVI is no more a Nazi than conservatives are racists.  And liberals, like Susan Sarandon and Barack Obama, are no more saints, heroes or anybody to look up to and admire than was Hitler.

Why Liberals Always Play The “Conservatives Are Racist” Card

Very simply, it works.  And liberals do it to deflect, detract and distract black Americans from their own racist streaks.

We’re still discussing, analyzing (and mostly mocking)  Morgan Freeman’s silly, misdirected tirade against the Tea Party.  This was not long after the Tea Party “suffered another setback” when Maxine Waters put in her two cents.  Now we have a brand new rant from an old, tired face, Janeane Garofalo,  She has called Republicans racist for Supporting Presidential contender Herman Cain.

For anyone who is not familiar with the Tea Party, it is a:

• Grass roots movement within the Republican Party that is fighting to bring back the core conservative values which they, and many other conservatives, feel has been watered down to the point that it has become almost impossible to tell the difference between a Republican and a Democrat.

• A party that seeks to support candidates who will reign in fiscal spending and reduce the size of government.

• A party that seeks to support candidates who will cut taxes.   Its very name is an acronym for Taxed Enough Already.

The Tea Party is largely responsible for helping conservative Republicans win back the House of Representatives in an historic sweep in the the 2010 mid term elections.  A feat, a devastating shock and a major set back which liberals have not, nor will they, ever get over.  This is why Hollywood liberals like Morgan Freeman and Janeane Garofalo play the “conservatives are racist” card; why liberal politicians like Maxine waters does; why liberal pundits like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Ed Shultz, etc., do it; and why the liberal media establishment does nothing to expose their lies, their hypocrisy and their own racist, anti-black views which liberals have harbored for generations.  It is Janene Garafalo who is the racist!

In the above link, she has called Republicans racist for supporting Herman Cain; a business man, a candidate for President of the United States (winner of the Florida Straw Poll) and a black man.  She attests that supporting Cain helps “hide the racist element within the Republican Party”.

Ladies and gentleman – conservatives cannot seem to win.  Conservatives were called racist for opposing Barack Obama, a black man, during his successful run for the Presidency.  Now we are called racist for supporting Herman Cain, another black man, in his bid to become the second black President of the United States.

What’s going on here?

Herman Cain is both black and conservative.  This is double dynamite to liberals who view any black man or woman who rejects liberalism, who embraces conservatism and conservative values, as sell outs.  It is the reason Clarence Thomas was so vilified during his confirmation hearings; it is why Condoleezza Rice was mocked during her tenure as Secretary of State under President George W. Bush; it is why Herman Cain will not receive any support or love among most black Americans.  And if Cain wins, if he becomes the second black American President, as a conservative he will be excoriated, raked over the coals and torn to shreds by the white, liberal media establishment and Hollywood liberals like Garafalo, as black Americans like Morgan Freeman, black politicians like Waters, the majority of whom are Democrat, do nothing to stop it.

It is conservatives who love other conservatives, regardless of whether they are black or white, or even hispanic or latino, as in the case of Florida Senator, Marco Rubio.  (He is very seriously being considered as a Vice Presidential candidate)  Why would conservatives, if we really were racist, support a black man for President and a latino for Vice President?

Conversely, it is liberals like Garofalo, Freeman, Waters, Matthews, etc., who hate, despise and loathe any and all conservatives, including those who are black.  And it is why they see no hypocrisy, no racism whatsoever in their own words and beliefs (which are blatantly racist and filled with racist overtones) regarding conservatives, including those who are black.

Who are the real racists here?

It will be interesting to see, if Herman Cain does become the candidate of choice, whether or not liberals will insist on continuing to play the “conservatives are racist” card, and whether black Americans will oblige them, or finally begin to see liberals for the real racists that they are.  It will also be fascinating to observe liberals and their reaction to a Mitt Romney, Rick Perry or another white candidate becoming the Republican choice for President, and whether liberals will still cry “racism” for not more vigorously and enthusiastically supporting Cain.

However loud the “conservatives are racists” cry is now, and during the 2012 Presidential election, from liberals both black and white, an intriguing development is occurring in America.  Not only is America becoming more conservative, but more blacks are themselves throwing off the shackles of liberalism and embracing conservatism.  It is evidenced by the black exodus which is occurring, and for which the 2010 Census indicates.  More blacks are fleeing the oppressive, liberal north for the more inviting, conservative south which offer blacks better living conditions, less crime and more job opportunities with more competitive wages.

In the next ten years, as this steady migration among blacks from the north to the south continues, as more blacks become conservatives, as more states become “redstate” conservative states and Democrats and liberals lose even more power and influence, one thing is for sure – that cry of “conservatives are racists” will be most loudest among white liberals and less apparent within black circles.  That cry of “conservatives are racists” will be drowned out by a rousing conservative “Huzzah!” by both whites and blacks shouting in unison, in harmony, in the spirit of American conservatism, in the spirit of America itself.

And white liberals will have nowhere, or no one, to play their “conservatives are racists” card to.  Except themselves.

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers

%d bloggers like this: