Of Michelle Goldberg Part 9: To Her, A “Wrongful Birth” Means One Less Abortion
Pro-abortion advocates, and Michelle Goldberg, who frequently cheer-leads for the cause, see no value, no worth, no actual life in any fetus to begin with. But a fetus which has developed some type of abnormality, such a Downs Syndrome, or where one or more of its body parts is either deformed or missing altogether is even less worth saving, from the pro-abortion perspective. Many women obviously would want to abort such children “for their own good” – the child’s own good, that is. But is the mother really aborting the child for its own good, or hers?
Outrage within the pro-abortion community is brewing over whether or not a doctor can intentionally keep information about a woman’s unborn child from her when abnormalities arise, thinking, fearing she might abort it if she found out. Arizona just passed a bill to protect doctors who lie to pregnant mothers in what has been dubbed “wrongful birth”. Wrongful birth, because had the mother known of the “malady” ahead of the birth, she might have opted for the abortion instead, thereby “sparing” the child all the “pain” and “hurt” and “psychological” and “emotional” scars it would encounter throughout its life. Death, advocates Michelle Goldberg, and pro-abortion supporters, is the preferred option.
From The Daily Beast, writes Michelle:
In some states, though, anti-abortion activists are pushing legislation to protect doctors who don’t give women all available information about their pregnancies. Arizona and Kansas are considering bills that would ban lawsuits in cases where doctors fail to warn their patients about birth defects. The Arizona law, which is similar to legislation that exists in a handful of other states, would apply only when doctors make a mistake. But the Kansas provision, part of a sweeping, 69-page anti-abortion bill, would allow physicians to lie to women who might otherwise terminate their pregnancies. It is similar to a law in Oklahoma passed two years ago—in concert, ironically, with mandatory ultrasound legislation.
While Michelle is flabbergasted that a woman would not be given the information about her unborn child’s development, or underdevelopment, so she can quickly abort it if she chooses, interestingly, but not surprisingly, Michelle, and all pro-abortion advocates, would rather deny women the right to know the child they are about to abort is actually a human being by showing the mother an ultrasound image of her child. This begs the question – if a woman would feel uncomfortable viewing a picture of a healthy child she is about to kill, would a woman want to see the ultrasound picture of her underdeveloped child so she can feel more comfortable killing it?
Michelle argues that doctors who are allowed to lie are also getting away with their own responsibility in the prenatal care of the fetus, and should complications arise, a doctor who knowingly keeps such information from the mother would not be liable, and therefore cannot be sued. Well, from the pro-abortion point of view, how can any doctor be sued for “negligence” if a fetus is not a human being to begin with? Michelle’s argument is baseless if she is also taking the position that a fetus is not a human being. But if a fetus is a human being, then her and the entire pro-abortion position becomes baseless as well as dangerous. Michelle cannot have it both ways.
Doctors are fearful, and rightfully so, that when they relay the news to the mother her fetus will not be born “normal” she will want to abort her child rather than give it life. Granted, doctors ought not lie, or feel compelled to lie, in order to protect the life of an unborn fetus. Nor ought women feel helpless that a child born with an abnormality, disability or deformity is going to automatically have less quality of life than anyone else. if anything, it is the pro-abortion movement which has placed doctors in the position of having to lie in order to protect the unborn child from being aborted.
We, who are born relatively normal, cannot fathom our lives without arms or legs, without sight or hearing, without a sound mind, etc. But for those people who are born without arms or legs, who are born blind and/or deaf, who are born with an underdeveloped brain or any type of disability or abnormality – do they actually miss what they never had? And would they rather their mothers had killed them in womb than give them a life, an opportunity for life, which pro-abortion advocates consider substandard and subhuman, but which they, and millions of others who were given life, consider a better alternative to death?
Millions of people are born with all sorts of disabilities, abnormalities, complications, etc, and do lead normal, healthy, worthwhile and satisfying lives. Why would Michelle Goldberg and pro-abortion supporters so selfishly deny these people the right to live?
We, who are born relatively normal, are acting selfishly, and for ourselves, when we support abortion over life. If a woman has a legal right to abort a child for one reason, then rationally she has a right to abort a child for any reason. And therein lies the crux of the abortion problem and why this is a situation of all or nothing. In other words, either we allow abortion for any reason, or we don’t allow it at all. But if we allow abortion for any reason, pro-abortion advocates must accept, and be willing to accept abortion in cases where a child will be born gay, black (non-white) or female. Can liberals, like Michelle Goldberg, stomach these types of abortions as well as they stomach every other type of abortion?
If we who are pro-life can challenge Michelle, and all pro-abortion advocates on this, we can win this debate faster and easier than arguing abortion from strictly a religious point of view. Abortion is a moral issue also, and either life has value or it hasn’t. Force pro-abortion advocates to admit that they support killing black babies, gay babies and female babies in the womb; force them to admit they support killing blind babies, deaf babies, Downs Syndrome babies, and any babies that will be born with any type of abnormalities and they, along with their pro-abortion position, will disintegrate. Are we up to that challenge?
- A response to the dilemma of abortion or You’re Nobody ‘Til Somebody Loves You (niederfrank.wordpress.com)
- Of Michelle Goldberg Part 6: The “Extreme” Value Of Human Life (neosecularist.com)
- Should Doctors Be Able to Lie to Patients? Arizona Republicans Say “Yes!” (blogcritics.org)
- The Unborn Child – Just A “Heartbeat” Away From Planned Parenthood Killing It (neosecularist.com)
- Arizona Passes “Wrongful Birth” Bill (jonathanturley.org)
- Of Michelle Goldberg Part 8: Contraception,Terri Schiavo And Liberals Who Devote Themselves To The Culture Of Death (nebraskaenergyobserver.wordpress.com)
- Of Michelle Goldberg Part 8: Contraception,Terri Schiavo And Liberals Who Devote Themselves To The Culture Of Death (theconservativehillbilly.wordpress.com)
- Pro-Abortion Stance Must Include Killing Gays, Blacks And Girls In The Womb (neosecularist.com)