Terry O’Neill, NOW President, Wants Your Baby To Die!
Terry O’Neill, President of the National Organization Of Women, (referred lovingly by Rush Limbaugh as the NAGS), lost in her own translation, and having abandoned all sense of reason, is trying desperately to paint conservatives as anti-woman and anti- women’s “health”. While this is a lie, and an absurd one at that, what is not a lie is that Terry O’Neill, and other liberal pro-abortion feminists, are doing everything they can to undermine a woman right to knowledge and education, particularly in the case of pregnancy and abortion, and how much information women are provided about their unborn baby.
Terry and her ilk don’t want women informed at all about what is going on inside their own bodies, which is why she, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW and all her pro-abortion liberal feminists and allies are up in arms over any law that would delay a woman from seeking an abortion. Ultrasounds are the new battle, which Terry describes as “violating a woman’s body and rights”. It’s yet another pathetic and disgraceful attempt by pro-abortion supporters to remove any necessary and imperative obstacles from a woman who is seeking to end a pregnancy out of emotional turmoil rather than because there is any real medical or health threat to her life.
“For decades, the radical right has been chipping away at women’s access to reproductive health care.”
Translation: The “radical” Right has been chipping away at access to abortion on demand as a means of birth control, and using abortion, which is the killing of an unborn child, for purposes other than to save the life of the mother.
“After the 2010 elections, these attacks escalated into an outright War on Women.”
Translation: These so-called “attacks”, which are indeed a “war” were never about or against women. Rather these “wars” are all about ensuring women have the right to know everything about their pregnancy and their unborn child, including the fact that their unborn child is actually a living human being. Ultrasounds prove that by snapping a picture of the fetus, which is clearly identifiable, any women looking at it can clearly discern a human being in that picture. Terry knows a fetus is in fact a living human being, But she would rather women still have the right to kill it, and she is worried to death that if a woman who is contemplating an abortion is shown an image of her actual child inside her womb, that woman will change her mind about having the abortion. Stuff like that scares Terry, all liberal pro-abortion feminists, and pro-culture of death liberals, to death.
“Now, the Republican presidential primaries are offering a disturbing glimpse into the supposed conservative vision for this country. In this right-wing utopia, women will no longer be able to exercise the right to control their bodies, plan their families or safeguard their own health.”
Translation: The “utopia” we envision is one in which women have been provided the right information and education, which is currently being denied them at Planned Parenthood, to make an informed decision about abortion, what abortion really is – the killing of an unborn child – and to come to the realization, on her own, that having an abortion for emotional reasons is not the best response for her or her baby. Our “utopia” absolutely includes safeguards, put in place to protect unborn life from being wantonly, maliciously and intentionally destroyed. The unborn obviously do not have a voice of their own. We, who are pro-life, need to be their voice and speak on their behalf. Conservatives are not interested in “controlling women’s bodies”. We are interested in ensuring that the unborn child, which is also a “body” has protection and rights too, namely the right to live.
“The church and the state will tell women what is best for them, and religious entities’ “liberty” will consistently trump individual women’s right to live and work free from discrimination and in accordance with their own religious and moral beliefs.”
Translation: Terry wants the government to force religious institutions to provide medication and services it finds morally objectionable. That is what Obama’s contraception mandate is all about and why you are hearing about it constantly on the news. The church is not trying to tell “women what is best for them”. Any church certainly tells its own constituents what is best for them, according to their own doctrines and beliefs, which each member voluntary accepts as part of belonging to that particular church. It is Terry, Barack Obama and the democrat Party – not the church – which is attempting to force itself and its will on the American people.
“Much of the current he-man chest thumping is done for the benefit of voters who might be swayed to cast their ballots for the GOP based largely on social issues. And, as demonstrated in Virginia this week, conservative politicians are perfectly capable of putting on the brakes when proceeding with a piece of their anti-woman agenda appears to be backfiring.”
Translation: Not only is there plenty of “He-man thumping” going in, there is plenty of “She-woman” thumping going on as well. Terry still doesn’t understand that there are tens of millions of women who are pro-life. Terry still believes, erroneously, that abortion is a woman’s right issue; that access to abortion somehow empowers women and creates equality among the sexes. The only thing abortion, and access to abortion, does is kills an unborn child. That is abortion’s only purpose. That some politicians, including Republicans, have caved is an indication of their own political cowardice, and is more evidence they, as in the case of Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, are more concerned with saving their own worthless political life than unborn life.
“Still, the right-wing commitment to keeping women in check is surprisingly strong and reveals a frightening disrespect, even contempt for women who aren’t sufficiently submissive.”
Translation: Our “commitment” to the unborn, their right to live and protecting them from harm, is the only thing we, pro-life conservatives, are trying to “keep in check”. What can be so “frightening” about that? And what can be so “contemptible” about that? Here, again, Terry views abortion as women’s empowerment; that taking the right to abortion away from women somehow diminishes their role in society and makes them that much more “submissive”. This is another area, for which liberal feminist, anti-male, Terry O’Neill just doesn’t understand, or want to understand. To conservatives, being “submissive” is a two-way street, which includes men, and husbands, being just as equally “submissive” to women, and their wives, as women, and wives, need to be to men, and their husbands. That is equality. What Terry wants is superiority, and for women to be superior, to have special rights which includes the right to kill an unborn child.
“Turning the clock back includes shaming women for their sexuality and punishing them for terminating a pregnancy (which is still legal, by the way). This brings us to one of the more degrading tactics up the radical-right sleeve: mandatory ultrasound laws.”
Translation: Our goal, as pro-life conservatives, is indeed to “turn back the clock” to a time when abortion was virtually never a consideration used to end a pregnancy. Whether “punishing” a woman for “terminating her pregnancy” – killing her unborn child – is a punishable offense in some places has nothing whatsoever to do with “shaming women for their sexuality”. Whatever “shame” was involved in the past, and past dealings with regards to unintended, unplanned pregnancies, when a woman or girl became pregnant, and was not married, no longer exists in America today and is not longer a plausible scenario. Women, including conservative and pro-life women, have no intention of reverting back to the days of old and “shaming” women and girls by sending them to see an “aunt in Boston” or to a convent, a shabby, run-down women’s shelter or throwing them out of their house, or in prison, or whatever other horror stories Terry O’Neill is irrationally worried will happen. That part of America is passed. We, pro-life conservatives, have evolved. It is Terry who is still living in the past.
“Under these laws, before a woman can undergo an abortion procedure, a doctor must perform an ultrasound and offer the woman an opportunity to view the image of the fetus or hear a detailed description.”
Translation: Well, since this is exactly the intent of the laws being proposed, no translation needed. Why is Terry so fearful and terrified of ultrasounds? A woman viewing an image of her unborn child could very well become teary eyed, have a change of heart and stop the abortion from occurring. What other reason is there for opposing an ultrasound? It’s invasive? Absolute BS. How invasive is the actual abortion itself? And if a woman is willing to undergo an invasive procedure to kill her unborn child, why the hell would she be unwilling to undergo a so-called “invasive” procedure to snap a picture of the unborn child she is about to kill?
“As ultrasounds are rarely medically necessary prior to an abortion, these laws exist to demean the woman and make the procedure more expensive to boot. Ultrasound costs range from $300 to $700, and the woman, of course, is typically expected to pay for this state-mandated exam.”
Translation: Of course ultrasounds are not “medically necessary”. But they are nonetheless imperative. They do not “exist to demean women”, but to educate and inform women to the fact there is an unborn child in their womb, not a blob of tissue or collection of cells. Terry is not worried about the cost of the ultrasound because of its expense. The cost of the abortion itself is roughly the same cost as an ultrasound. What Terry is worried about is the profit lost from the abortion. A woman shown an image of the child, just moments away from execution, may very well opt to save her child from permanent destruction. If that happens, Planned Parenthood and the abortionist don’t make any money. On the other hand, think of the millions of dollars Planned Parenthood could reap and profit from, from the ultrasounds themselves! There’s an angle even pro-abortion supporters never thought of.
“But the most disturbing aspect of these laws is that in the vast majority of abortions, which occur far too early in pregnancy for an external (“jelly on the belly”) ultrasound to produce an image, the ultrasound must be transvaginal — i.e., a long wand-like ultrasound probe must be inserted deep into the woman’s vagina. This is, quite simply, state-sponsored rape. Even the FBI recognized last year, as most states did long ago, that vaginal penetration without a woman’s consent is rape.”
Translation: Terry fears “a long wand-like ultrasound probe” being “inserted deep into a woman’s vagina”. And she calls that not just “rape”, but “state sponsored rape”. Hmm. How exactly is the actual abortion performed? Is nothing similar to a “wand-like” instrument “inserted deep into a woman’s vagina” to extricate the unborn child? In other words, whether it is an instrument to take a picture of an unborn child, or an instrument to remove and kill it, there is some type of instrument being “inserted deep into a woman’s vagina”. In that event, we either have “state sponsored rape”, (which is in itself an over-reaction) or we have state sponsored killing of an unborn child. Which is the lessor of two evils?
Terry O’Neill is acting through emotions, rather than through reality or rationality. So are all liberal pro-abortion feminists, and all liberals who support abortion. The point of having an ultrasound is to empower women, to provide a woman seeking an abortion with as much information as she can have to make an informed decision. Terry O’Neil, although she says she is pro-women’s rights, nonetheless would rather women be left in the dark, forbidden important knowledge, restricted from access to real health information, and “shamed” for wanting to know as much about her pregnancy and her unborn child as she can know.
Terry O’Neill is the real rapist here. Terry is raping all women of valuable and critical information pertaining to their pregnancies. Terry is the one “inserting” her “long wand-like probe” into women – not into their vaginas, but into their brains and their minds, and with that probe Terry is sucking out every bit, and every last vestige of, woman-hood and what it means to be a woman, changing women into pro-abortion feminist robots that are easy to control and manipulate and easy for her, Planned Parenthood, NARAL and her NOW group to force into their “submission”.
For all women who want to retain their true independence, want true empowerment, want true equality, want to control their own bodies - choose the pro-life side. Men who are pro-abortion have little respect for women, and women who are pro-abortion have little respect for themselves. Conversely, men who are pro-life have enough respect for women, and more respect for women than men who are pro-abortion, to keep their hands off women and to keep themselves restrained. And women who are pro-life will be less sexually active before marriage than women who are pro-abortion, because women who are pro-life, who are empowered with knowledge, will understand that the more often they have sex, regardless of how “safe” it is, there is always the possibility of becoming pregnant.
In other words, if women want men to be more submissive, if women really want to be more dominant – take back, and take control of, your sexuality. Don’t spread it around and cheapen it and yourself. Men love “easy” women. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they love women.
How is Terry O’Neill, President of NOW, helping women by cheapening and degrading them, their sexuality, for the sole discretion and delight of men? What is “pro-woman” about that?
- Abortion Not (Just) A Religious Issue – It’s Terry O’Neill Who Is “Poppycock” (neosecularist.com)
- Why The Left Opposes Ultrasounds For Women Seeking Abortion (neosecularist.com)
- Of Michelle Goldberg Part 8: Contraception,Terri Schiavo And Liberals Who Devote Themselves To The Culture Of Death (neosecularist.com)
- Pro-Abortion Stance Must Include Killing Gays, Blacks And Girls In The Womb (neosecularist.com)
- Abortion Is An Emotional Choice Not A Rational Choice (neosecularist.com)