The Neosecularist

On Valentine’s Day, HuffPost Says “Give Your Woman What She Really Wants” – An Abortion!

This Valentine’s Day, don’t waste your money on chocolate and flowers, don’t throw your hard-earned money down the toilet at some fine restaurant – instead, surprise the woman you love by taking her to the nearest abortion clinic.  Or, give her a gift card for when that “time is right”.  Show how much you love your woman by going with her into the abortion chamber of horrors together because nothing says loving, apparently, like killing your unborn child on Valentine’s Day.  And while many couples use Valentine’s Day to create a child out of love, liberals would like you to know that, this Valentine’s Day, and for all those Valentine’s Days yet to come – couples can also bond together for the express purpose of murdering their unborn child.  Talk about a St. Valentine’s Day massacre!

From the Arianna Nation comes this “lovely Valentine’s Day gift from one of HuffPost’s SS columnists, Robert Engelman:

“Valentine’s Day has long celebrated love with caring notes, decadent chocolates and romantic arrangements of flowers. But this Valentine’s Day, perhaps it’s time to celebrate with a gift many of the world’s women desperately want and need: reproductive health.”

“Reproductive health” is, and always has been, code for abortion.  But because abortion involves the killing of an unborn child, and liberals know that, they must use less frightening concepts to conceal their real intentions and their real desires.  In other words, if reproductive health was really about providing breast cancer screening, proper and safer pregnancy and childbirth techniques and other real gynecological concerns, liberals would spell it out that way in plain English.  Robert Engelman, who is the President of Worldwatch Institute, which is concerned with population growth and sustainable societies supports abortion as a means of population control and uses “reproductive health” as a guise to hide his despicable and altogether sinister goals.

“Reproductive health, including access to the information and means to plan a family, is a human right the world’s nations have recognized in various forms since 1968. Access to family planning and other reproductive health services safeguard the lives of women and their children and promote families that are emotionally and economically healthy.”

“And means to plan a family”?  In other words, men and women all over the world are having unprotected sex.   In numerous instances, an unplanned pregnancy occurs.  So, rather than man up (or woman up), Arianna Nation SS columnist Engelman advocates “access to family planning and other reproductive health services” as a “safeguard”.  Or – abortion, and the right to obtain an abortion to control population growth and ensure another unwanted child is not brought into the world.

Engelman, like all liberals, would never advocate abstinence, which is peculiar, since abstinence is the surest way to not get pregnant, and to not bring another unwanted, unplanned child into the world.  If Engelman really wanted population growth to slow and, over time, to be reduced, he would disseminate pro-abstinence literature to all the developing countries he is, supposedly, deeply concerned are over populated. If Engelman was really concerned with women’s health, which he is not, instead of advocating for an easy way out of an unplanned pregnancy, he would advocate for unmarried women and girls (and men and boys) to remain celibate until they are married.  If Engelman really wants to see the world’s population cut in half, he would support a real plan for women and girls that empowered them to hold onto their virginity until married, rather than including abortion as a means of population control.

“Reproductive health is not about state-mandated family sizes; it is about freeing women to make their own choices about when and how often to give birth. In all countries where affordable access is offered to family planning resources and women have the option of safe and legal abortions, women’s fertility rates drop to two or less children per woman.”

“Reproductive health”, to liberals, is all about abortion, and the money made from those abortions.  Abstinence “frees women to make their own choices”.  Abstinence is the best “option”.  Liberals, like Engelman, have no real respect or concern for women.  If he did, why does his concern for them only begin after a pregnancy occurs?  Engelman is only concerned with death, and using death to control and suppress population growth.  An unborn child, to Engelman, is not a human being, but a detriment to the Earth and to the society in which it would be born.

By the way, Engelman would also have American taxpayers pay for women around the world to have those abortions.

” A study by the UNFPA and the Guttmacher Institute suggests that it would take USD $24 billion to fulfill unmet reproductive health needs in developing countries, several times what countries spend today. According to the report, such an investment would “provide every woman with the recommended standard of maternal and newborn care” and would “[r]educe unintended pregnancies by more than 66 percent, prevent 70 percent of maternal deaths, avert 44 percent of newborn deaths, and reduce unsafe abortion by 73 percent.”

It’s a tragedy that there are still many countries where women and girls cannot control their own bodies with regards to sex.  And it’s a tragedy that men would still behave in such a depraved manner towards women.  However, there are just as many couples engaged in sex because they want it, and very often an unintended pregnancy results.  The less value a society places on life, the more they will show disrespect and contempt for any life  – the women and girls who they view as subhuman and the unborn children they reject as being human.  The best way to protect women from unwanted advances that lead to unwanted pregnancies is to educate both men and women, and boys and girls, to respect and value life, not to destroy it.

Ladies and gentleman – this Valentine’s Day, and for every day of the year, show each other just how much you really love one another by not creating an unplanned child.  And if you do – create a plan for life instead of death.  Using Valentine’s Day, of all days out of the year, to advocate for abortion and the killing of unborn children shows just how deeply committed liberals, like Engelman, are in the destruction of human life around the world.  Free sex, free love and free abortions – paid for by American taxpayers.  Is that what Valentine’s Day is really about?