Pro-Life Women Are Watching Also, Cecile Richards
On the 39th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, women are indeed “watching” and they are angry as hell that the monstrous, evil practice that is abortion has not yet been overturned. But if you were only to listen to radical feminist, Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, you would get the impression that all women fully supported abortion, and fully support Roe vs. Wade. What is Cecile Richards response to the fact that scores of millions of women in fact oppose abortion and are working hard to overturn Roe vs. Wade? Answer? Repugnant, indignant silence.
Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood, liberal feminists all make it sound as if abortion is a fundamental and imperative “woman’s right” issue, and that without it women are inferior and less equal to men and/or second class citizens in America. That, if Roe vs. Wade was ever to be overturned, women would somehow loss something of value, some piece of their identity, some inherent and innate freedom and right. But the only thing that is “lost” when Roe vs. Wade is overturned is a woman’s right to kill her unborn child. That is, and has been, the defining issue for the past 39 years. Every time a woman has an abortion she is in actuality killing her unborn child, whether she is aware she is or not.
There is no reason to doubt Cecile Richards, or Planned Parenthood, NARAL and NOW all know abortion kills unborn children. There is also no reason to doubt they do not care. To them, pregnancy is like a terminal cancer. Pregnancy, to them, means a life sentence of stay at home mother-hood. This is what they fear most. More women staying at home to raise the kids, either leaving the workforce or never entering it. In other words, pure, unadulterated selfishness.
Richards celebrate Roe vs. Wade as:
The time the Supreme Court recognized the inherent right to privacy for women…
But at that time, in 1973, because science and medicine were both more primitive, the Supreme Court was forced to make an error of judgement in ruling on the side of abortion, and granting, a right to it. The Supreme Court, because the evidence did not yet exist, did not recognize that an unborn child is a human being from the moment of conception. Science was not as advanced in 1973 and the technology to peer inside the womb was unavailable. And yet, while this technology has been available for years now, we are still debating whether or not abortion is the killing of an unborn human being or merely the removal of a blob of tissue or collection of cells, or whatever other disgusting euphemisms the pro-abortion movement ascribes abortion as being.
Cecile explains the fundamental and critical importance of Roe vs. Wade and abortion this way:
[As] an urgent issue given that women were dying in emergency rooms across the country from self-induced abortions.
In other words, we are supposed to keep abortion on demand legal for all women because a tiny, tiny minority of women, a fraction of the actual number and percentage of women have, in the past, and of their own free will, self aborted, and died??? And should Roe vs. Wade be overturned, there is the possibility several woman could be forced, of their own free will, to revert back to the illustrious “back-alley abortions”??? The infamous metal coat hangers??? The storied and “heroic” long trips across the country to find the one person who can end their pregnancy in secret and save them from mother-hood???
Ladies and gentleman – Cecile Richards is engaging in deception, as is Planned Parenthood and the entire pro-abortion industry. The vast majority of women who became pregnant prior to Roe vs. Wade carried the pregnancy through. Granted, in cases of young girls, there was still that stigma and shame attached, and perhaps they were sent away to visit an “Aunt”. However, abortion is not now legal, is not now so rigorously fought for strictly to keep women from engaging in those dangerous “back alley abortions”. Abortion is kept alive, and fought for by Richards, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW, etc. for two reasons. One – to keep women and girls from having to decide over caring for a child or a career. Two – because abortion is not done pro-bono, it remains a very profitable business and money-maker.
Another of Cecile’s canards:
But today, women across the nation are disturbed to see a set of politicians doing everything they can to undermine this landmark decision that has stood as a critical safeguard for women’s health for four decades.
To the many millions of American women who are pro-life, abortion has never “stood as a critical safeguard for women’s health”. That is a feminist prevarication. It has, of course, stood as a critical safeguard for liberal feminists who desire to indoctrinate other unsuspecting girls and women, into believing abortion, under the guise of a “right to privacy” is a woman’s right issue that cannot, must not be breached. Because if it is, all women, so feminists profess, will be unduly subjected to the “horrors” and “unimaginable dangers” of the past. Richards always invokes “dangerous and illegal abortions”, but what her greatest fear is, is seeing America revert back to the 1950′s and the “Father Knows Best“, “Ozzie and Harriet“, and “Leave it to Beaver” way of life that makes feminists like Richards cringe and squeal in disgust.
Look at it this way – if abortion really provides a safeguard to women’s “health”, the challenge for Richards is to explain what the specific “health” issue is, which she and the rest of the feminists never do. And if it is not life threatening, then it is treatable for both mother and unborn child. So, why kill the child in the womb if both it and mother can live? Until Richards and the entire pro-abortion movement, can be thoroughly challenged to define what specific “health” issue(s) warrants the killing of an unborn child, they will keep using “health” as a generic euphemism for what really amounts to their fear of America, and American values, returning to the era of the 1950′s.
There is nothing “anti-woman” about being pro-life. Abortion rights are under assault now because more and more American women, and men, are coming to that conclusion. The tide is indeed turning, and the filth of Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW and the entire pro-abortion movement is slowly washing away.
We know Roe vs. Wade will celebrate its 40th anniversary next January 22nd. Let us hope (and pray, for those of you who are religious) that there is a Republican in the White House by then, and the House and Senate is controlled by a majority of pro-life conservatives who will finally topple this national disgrace which has seen the killing of over 50 millions human beings, the vast multitude of which were exterminated needlessly and selfishly.
As new measures are introduced to put an end to the despicable, evil practice of abortion, Richards and her feminist pro-abortion ilk will kick, scream and move about even harder to keep the killing of unborn children legal. We know that.
We also know that unborn children have the ability to kick and move about in the womb – a sign of life. As Richards kicks and flails about madly, insanely, irrationally, fighting to keep abortion alive, will unborn children have to kick all that much harder to let their mothers know they are fighting to keep alive, that they want the chance to live – and they do not want to be killed?